Valid to whom? I'd suggest a study of the history of documents and positions,
compiled by the
folks who developed this dictionary of terms and you can decide if it's valid
for you or not.
Lionel Boxer wrote:
> Is this criticism valid or are the criticisms an indication that Foucault
> has been elevated to messianic proportions and we are seeing the formation
> of schisms and denominations?
> Lionel
>
> >From: Sissy <sissy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Even by the self account of the folks who put that dictionary together
> >repeatedly say the "good" lays outside of fact. "Good" to whose
> >account?
> >
> >Jivko Georgiev wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe. But the good in it is the idea for Foucault
> > > dictionary.
> > > --- Hansdao@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > This dictionary is fraught with error and
> > > > misinformation!!
> > > >
> > > > Hans Skott-Myhre
> > > > University of Minnesota.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> > >
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
