MICHEL FOUCAULT, info.

Repository of Texts by Foucault: Books | Articles | Lectures



 

Foucault-L mail-list

RE: Eventualization

List Information Page | search this list | RSS Feed    - switch to: Subject Directory | Date Directory | Author Directory -

 
<< Thread Prev < Date Prev ^ date index+… ^ thread index+… Date Next > Thread Next >>
message ## 07970…

 
+  From: "Hennon, Lisa" <hennon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+  Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 07:18:46 -0400
Your question about eventualization is very interesting. I have a vague
sense of Foucault's use of the term but can't locate the texts right now to
cope with the question. Could you add more specifics to the question? For
instance, why does it matter that people are now aware of something that is
nothing new? Does a threshold of populational awareness effect an "event"?
I would really enjoy knowing more of your thoughts about the question.
Thanks for posing it.

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Lionel Boxer [mailto:lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 10:30 AM
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Eventualization


Would it be fair to say that the decision to selectively assault Afganistan
is a reaction that could be explained by eventualization?

Suddenly people are aware that there is a thing called terrorism. It is
nothing new.

I am in Toronto for a few weeks if anyone want to meet with me.

Lionel

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Previous by Thread: Eventualization
Next by Thread: "event" v. historical practice (was 'the concept of "event" and Bush')
Partial thread listing: