That's a good point...
Also, I have read somewhere, which escapes me now, that Foucault had never
read, or at least was not familiar with, Being and Time.
I don't know how accurate this is, but it would suggest that it was the
later Heidegger that Foucault was more acquainted with.
Kevin.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[
mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mark Kelly
Sent: 08 November 2004 02:55
To: Foucault List
Subject: Re: actualité
It seems to me that there's a hefty ahsitorical element to Heidegger's Being
and Time analytic of Dasein which makes it inimical to Foucault, who sees
subjectivity as historically constituted in a much stronger sense than the
early Heidegger. At least that's what I'm arguing in my thesis at present.
Possibly there's a great answer to this in Stuart's book, but I've left it
at home.
On 7/11/04 21:46, "Kevin Turner" <k_turner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Having slept on it, I'm inclined to agree with you. I too think that
> I am probably pushing things a bit too much here; especially the
> relation between Dasein and actualité. Maybe I inadvertently stumbled
> upon the limits to all of this when I noted that each is merely
> addressing a related question: what are we now!
>
> Regards - Kevin.
---
This message is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 01/11/2004