Re: deconstruction v. genealogy

Habermas describes 'effective history' (which i equate with the concept
of 'genealogy' in Foucault - pls correct me if you see a difference here)
as a process wherein "The horizon [is] open to ... [a] future, which is
determined by expectations in the present, [and which] guides our access to
the past". This would seem to me to be a process which would possibly
include 'deconstruction', but is not to be equated with it.

As I have already mentioned, if genealogy is not to be made analogous
with 'effective history', then this contribution of mine is irrelevant!
I make this equation by virtue of Foucault's essay "Nietzsche,
Geneaology, History" (1971), but am not sufficiently up with later essays to
know if the story stayed the same.



Partial thread listing: