Wasting people's time

I personally find it impossible to read Kant, Hegel, Spinoza, Husserl, or
in fact any "systematic" philosophy. I don't think, however, that this is
a cause for pride: I rather regret this inability on my part. It wouldn't
occur to me to sub to a Kant, Hegel or Spinoza list and waste people's time
by insisting on the righteousness of my non-understanding. Why is it
supposed to be appropriate to engage in this kind of self-satisfied deafness
on a Foucault list?



Partial thread listing: