>
> How about a discussion group on THE ORDER OF THINGS? We would have to
> read it slowly.
This sounds good: maybe a chapter at a time? And think of it
as a springboard for discussion instead of a limit?>
Darlene Sybert
http://www.missouri.edu/~c557506/index.htl
University of Missouri at Columbia, English Dept
Office: 6 Tate Hall Tu-Th 1:30-3:30 or by appt
******************************************************************************
At a lecture on linguistics, the speaker suggested there was no such thing
as a double positive, whereby two affirmatives resulted in a negative.
Someone from the audience called out "Yeah, right!" -Electronic AIR Nwslttr
******************************************************************************
------------------
> How about a discussion group on THE ORDER OF THINGS? We would have to
> read it slowly.
This sounds good: maybe a chapter at a time? And think of it
as a springboard for discussion instead of a limit?>
Darlene Sybert
http://www.missouri.edu/~c557506/index.htl
University of Missouri at Columbia, English Dept
Office: 6 Tate Hall Tu-Th 1:30-3:30 or by appt
******************************************************************************
At a lecture on linguistics, the speaker suggested there was no such thing
as a double positive, whereby two affirmatives resulted in a negative.
Someone from the audience called out "Yeah, right!" -Electronic AIR Nwslttr
******************************************************************************
------------------