> From: "Karl Carlile" <joseph@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:05:34 +0000
> Subject: Re: Enough!
> Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What a clever deduction. What a contradiction! Exhorting people to
> ignore me while you reocognise by this very message of yours.
> Foucalult would be proud of you.
> >
> > I subscribed to this list from the other end of the world because I
> > thought I was going to have a chance to discuss Foucault. But Karl
> > Carlile has now become the main topic of debate. Why don't we just
> > ignore his messages? He seems to have no life other than these
> > polemics. He probably lives in his computer. He might even be a brain
> > in a vat! So can we please go back to Foucault?
> >
> >
>
>
> Yours etc.,
> Karl
>
>
>
Yours etc.,
Karl
> To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 1996 18:05:34 +0000
> Subject: Re: Enough!
> Reply-to: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What a clever deduction. What a contradiction! Exhorting people to
> ignore me while you reocognise by this very message of yours.
> Foucalult would be proud of you.
> >
> > I subscribed to this list from the other end of the world because I
> > thought I was going to have a chance to discuss Foucault. But Karl
> > Carlile has now become the main topic of debate. Why don't we just
> > ignore his messages? He seems to have no life other than these
> > polemics. He probably lives in his computer. He might even be a brain
> > in a vat! So can we please go back to Foucault?
> >
> >
>
>
> Yours etc.,
> Karl
>
>
>
Yours etc.,
Karl