> If I could second Professor Rehkopf's point about the importance of theory
> with regard to Foucault: His particular importance, it seems to me, is as
> a theorist of opposition in a post-Wall world. There is a great deal of
> confusion, angst, and uncertainty concerning the demise of the
> "Revolution" as a viable oppositional paradigm. Foucault, I think, was
> trying to present a new picture of the political world and a new
> justification for oppositional thought and practice appropriate to that
> world. If I may be allowed to mention it, I pursue this theme in my book,
> just released by Duke University Press, titled _Foucault's Discipline :
> The Politics of Subjectivity_.
>
> John Ransom
> Political Science
> Dickinson College, Carlisle PA
> ransom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Prof. Ransom,
Your book sounds very interesting. Would you be comfortable providing a
short summary of the contents here? An inside flap blurb or even a list
of chapter headings?
I've always thought subjectivity is the most important theme in
understanding Foucault's work, and would love to get a thumbnail sketch
of your work until I can get your book.
If you have time, of course.
Thanks,
Blaine Rehkopf
Philosophy
York University
CANADA
PS I should not misidentify myself; I do tend to profess too often, but
I'm not a Professor. One day....one day.... :)
--