Re: [Fwd: nasty cyber-nazis (fwd)]

>
> I write:
>
> Why would you suppress arguments made on the behalf of Nazism? If these
> arguments are as self-evidently wrong as you seem to imply, then we
> citizens will be able to recognise them as such. Why would we need a
> censor to tell us if something is self-evidently wrong?
>
> Paul S. Rhodes
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
>
> Quae facie praesignis erit, resupina iaceto

The original mail was a call to vote against the founding of an
alt.music.white.power newsgroup. This is not a question of censorship;
it is a question of enough people disagreeing with this type of thought
to keep it out of the community of the Internet. This is a democratic
choice to suppress the violent thought that most of us think is
just plain wrong. It is a matter of suppression, but not of
censorship because it is not one person denying the skinheads
a forum. It is a matter of many people voting to not allow
this type of thought into the egalitarian forum of newsgroups.
--
Dax Ross
RA Media
dax@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dax.ramedia.com

Partial thread listing: