In a message dated 98-02-20 20:02:46 EST, Mark.A.Cenite-2@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< What do you think of my hypothesis that now that "perverse" sexuality has
>been "implanted" in the subject (History I, pp. 36ff) and is viewed as a
>causal principle with general and diffuse effects (e.g., History I, p. 65),
>there is a tendency to make "the fundamental attribution error"--to
>attribute behavior (inappropriately) to (homo)sexuality? >>
absolutely. most crimes are committed by heterosexuals, yet you never hear
that maybe heterosexuality might be the problem.
john
solipsist9@xxxxxxx
<< What do you think of my hypothesis that now that "perverse" sexuality has
>been "implanted" in the subject (History I, pp. 36ff) and is viewed as a
>causal principle with general and diffuse effects (e.g., History I, p. 65),
>there is a tendency to make "the fundamental attribution error"--to
>attribute behavior (inappropriately) to (homo)sexuality? >>
absolutely. most crimes are committed by heterosexuals, yet you never hear
that maybe heterosexuality might be the problem.
john
solipsist9@xxxxxxx