From: IN%"postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "PMDF e-Mail Interconnect" 17-APR-1998 17:09:42.15
To: IN%"HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
CC:
Subj: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
Return-path: <>
Received: from TCP-DAEMON by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF04N81S0102OL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:39 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Received: from KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF031MAO0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
To: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <01IVZF03W05Y0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: MULTIPART/REPORT;
BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)"; REPORT-TYPE=DELIVERY-STATUS
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header f=
ields:
Message-id: <01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Foucault and Bathouses
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp; 550 <fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... =
User unknown
Remote system: dns; lists.village.VIRGINIA.edu (TCP|128.143.200.198=
|25) (lists.village.Virginia.EDU ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.6.6 ready at =
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 18:09:37 -0400) (lists.village.Virginia.EDU Hello SY=
STEM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [129.237.32.2], pleased to meet you)
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: message/DELIVERY-STATUS
Original-envelope-id: 01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reporting-MTA: dns; KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
Original-recipient: rfc822;fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Final-recipient: rfc822;fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remote-MTA: dns; lists.village.VIRGINIA.edu (TCP|128.143.200.198|25)
(lists.village.Virginia.EDU ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.6.6 ready at Fri, 17 Apr
1998 18:09:37 -0400)
(lists.village.Virginia.EDU Hello SYSTEM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [129.237.32.2],
pleased to meet you)
Diagnostic-code: smtp; 550 <fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: MESSAGE/RFC822
Return-path: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from TCP-DAEMON by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF031MAO0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Received: from KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZEVKMBW0000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for
fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Foucault and Bathouses
To: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-VMS-To: IN%"fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Again, do we know specifically what Foucault did or did not do? the
answer is in the negative. Jim Miller's poor work on Foucault is
not a valid source. Whether or not Foucault frequented the Barracks,
again is not an indication of sexual practice. The fact that the
Black & Blue plays a central part in Mr. Miller's work specifically
Chapter 8 I believe, shows how poorly researched his book was. Bill
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)--
To: IN%"HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
CC:
Subj: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
Return-path: <>
Received: from TCP-DAEMON by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF04N81S0102OL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:39 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Received: from KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF031MAO0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: PMDF e-Mail Interconnect <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
To: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <01IVZF03W05Y0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: MULTIPART/REPORT;
BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)"; REPORT-TYPE=DELIVERY-STATUS
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
This report relates to a message you sent with the following header f=
ields:
Message-id: <01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Foucault and Bathouses
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Recipient address: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp; 550 <fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... =
User unknown
Remote system: dns; lists.village.VIRGINIA.edu (TCP|128.143.200.198=
|25) (lists.village.Virginia.EDU ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.6.6 ready at =
Fri, 17 Apr 1998 18:09:37 -0400) (lists.village.Virginia.EDU Hello SY=
STEM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [129.237.32.2], pleased to meet you)
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: message/DELIVERY-STATUS
Original-envelope-id: 01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reporting-MTA: dns; KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
Original-recipient: rfc822;fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Final-recipient: rfc822;fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Remote-MTA: dns; lists.village.VIRGINIA.edu (TCP|128.143.200.198|25)
(lists.village.Virginia.EDU ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.6.6 ready at Fri, 17 Apr
1998 18:09:37 -0400)
(lists.village.Virginia.EDU Hello SYSTEM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [129.237.32.2],
pleased to meet you)
Diagnostic-code: smtp; 550 <fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... User unknown
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)
Content-type: MESSAGE/RFC822
Return-path: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from TCP-DAEMON by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZF031MAO0133BO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri,
17 Apr 1998 17:09:38 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Received: from KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU by KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU (PMDF V5.1-10 #24910)
id <01IVZEVKMBW0000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> for
fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 CDT (UTC -05:00)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 17:09:36 -0500 (UTC -05:00)
From: HUBDIL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Foucault and Bathouses
To: fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-id: <01IVZEVKMDS2000HLY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
X-VMS-To: IN%"fouault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Again, do we know specifically what Foucault did or did not do? the
answer is in the negative. Jim Miller's poor work on Foucault is
not a valid source. Whether or not Foucault frequented the Barracks,
again is not an indication of sexual practice. The fact that the
Black & Blue plays a central part in Mr. Miller's work specifically
Chapter 8 I believe, shows how poorly researched his book was. Bill
--Boundary_(ID_y+j1pSH5DsV5+oLUum0dcA)--