An error occured while delivering this message.
The error is stated below:
501 Syntax Error in parameters or arguments
Excerpt of original message:
To: larchap@xxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from [128.143.200.198] by Microsped.com id 5a400.wrk; Mon, 18 May 1998 11:18:00 EDT
Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id KAA18437 for foucault-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:57 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
Received: from garcia.uncg.edu (garcia.uncg.edu [152.13.2.13]) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA21249 for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:52 -0400
Received: from marta.uncg.edu (marta.uncg.edu [152.13.37.110])
by garcia.uncg.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26473
for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MARTA/SpoolDir by marta.uncg.edu (Mercury 1.21);
18 May 98 10:30:51 -500
Received: from SpoolDir by MARTA (Mercury 1.21); 18 May 98 10:30:36 -500
From: "henry sholar" <H_SHOLAR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: The University of NC at Greensboro
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 10:34:24 EST
Subject: Re: reified agency
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac (v2.1.2)
Message-ID: <A3B76245274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I find it is interesting in this dicsussion that there is an "we" versus "they"
>mentality- as if in any sort of free-er market society there is such thing as a
>"they" that does not include "we".
>
>This sort of thinking would suggest, on economic grounds, that "we" operate
>outside of a world which is constituted by the "they".
>
>But, whether one likes it or not, we don't.
>
to "whom" are "you" addressing this statement?
"I" would love to agree with "you."
sounds so simple and easy to trust having one world.
kindest regards,
henry
The error is stated below:
501 Syntax Error in parameters or arguments
Excerpt of original message:
To: larchap@xxxxxxxxxxx
Received: from [128.143.200.198] by Microsped.com id 5a400.wrk; Mon, 18 May 1998 11:18:00 EDT
Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) id KAA18437 for foucault-outgoing; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:57 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.Virginia.EDU: domo set sender to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
Received: from garcia.uncg.edu (garcia.uncg.edu [152.13.2.13]) by lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA21249 for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:52 -0400
Received: from marta.uncg.edu (marta.uncg.edu [152.13.37.110])
by garcia.uncg.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA26473
for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mon, 18 May 1998 10:30:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MARTA/SpoolDir by marta.uncg.edu (Mercury 1.21);
18 May 98 10:30:51 -500
Received: from SpoolDir by MARTA (Mercury 1.21); 18 May 98 10:30:36 -500
From: "henry sholar" <H_SHOLAR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: The University of NC at Greensboro
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 10:34:24 EST
Subject: Re: reified agency
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail/Mac (v2.1.2)
Message-ID: <A3B76245274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I find it is interesting in this dicsussion that there is an "we" versus "they"
>mentality- as if in any sort of free-er market society there is such thing as a
>"they" that does not include "we".
>
>This sort of thinking would suggest, on economic grounds, that "we" operate
>outside of a world which is constituted by the "they".
>
>But, whether one likes it or not, we don't.
>
to "whom" are "you" addressing this statement?
"I" would love to agree with "you."
sounds so simple and easy to trust having one world.
kindest regards,
henry