Daniel Vukovich wrote:
[...]Not that Hayek shouldnt be read of course,
>perhaps even as something more than a symptom; but his grounding of the
>"Good Society" in a spontaneous "catallaxy" somehow brought forth into the
>world by *the* Market is not only politically egregious, but simply absurd
>at some level (as if this harmonious Order has its Base in information
>about prices?!).
I would be especially appreciative if you'd elaborate just a bit
on what exactly makes Hayek's notion politically ergegious and absurd? And
I'd like to respectfully suggest that if you think that distributing price
information is the only way that market systems promote freedom, then you'd
better read some more Hayek (esp. The Fatal Conceit and The Sensory Order).
dls
[...]Not that Hayek shouldnt be read of course,
>perhaps even as something more than a symptom; but his grounding of the
>"Good Society" in a spontaneous "catallaxy" somehow brought forth into the
>world by *the* Market is not only politically egregious, but simply absurd
>at some level (as if this harmonious Order has its Base in information
>about prices?!).
I would be especially appreciative if you'd elaborate just a bit
on what exactly makes Hayek's notion politically ergegious and absurd? And
I'd like to respectfully suggest that if you think that distributing price
information is the only way that market systems promote freedom, then you'd
better read some more Hayek (esp. The Fatal Conceit and The Sensory Order).
dls