Matthew King wrote:
>My stars. Who am I to cast aspersions on the desires of the Chileans?
>Who are *you*, Daniel, to get so worked up on their behalf? (Maybe you
>are someone; if so, well, fair enough.)
I am dismayed that a philosopher (apparently) can't see that we're all
"someone", and that anyone is free to "get worked up" about anything they
like.
I wonder what sort of 'credentials' one must have in order to be "someone"?
Now that's a much more Foucauldian issue!
Colin Holmes,
Western Sydney
>My stars. Who am I to cast aspersions on the desires of the Chileans?
>Who are *you*, Daniel, to get so worked up on their behalf? (Maybe you
>are someone; if so, well, fair enough.)
I am dismayed that a philosopher (apparently) can't see that we're all
"someone", and that anyone is free to "get worked up" about anything they
like.
I wonder what sort of 'credentials' one must have in order to be "someone"?
Now that's a much more Foucauldian issue!
Colin Holmes,
Western Sydney