Jude (& others):
How would you compare the work of JGA Pocock (and/or Q. Skinner?) to
what Foucault's approach to discourses? And is Pocock at all relevant
to your own purpose of discerning "practical political languages?"
MT
>From owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 19 08:07:35 1999
>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id KAA87637 for foucault-outgoing; Fri, 19 Feb 1999
10:32:54 -0500
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender
to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>Received: from mailbox.syr.edu (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [128.230.18.5]) by
lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16460 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:32:48 -0500
>Received: from [128.230.151.72] (sudial0410-072.syr.edu
[128.230.151.72])
> by mailbox.syr.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA09934
> for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:32:44
-0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <v03007803b2f33220985e@[128.230.151.72]>
>In-Reply-To: <000701be5bf1$93c72360$845708c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:38:00 -0500
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: Jude Hollins <jlhollin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: epistemology & political sociology?
>Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>what does F's work offer epistemology and/or political sociology?
>
>three texts can frame this question for me, personally.
>
>habermas's _philosophical discourses_
>linda alcoff's _real knowing_
>thomas popkewitz's _political sociology of education reform_
>
>i suppose foucault's "what is enlightenment?" is a point of entrance
for
>me. discussion between butler, benhabib, and fraser (etc) certainly
has
>import.
>
>but, the question at the top is one i am trying to engage, having
specific
>"stakes". my own work involves contemporary education reform movements
and
>conversations.
>
>i wonder what others might think (and how they would translate such
thought
>into common tongue, and resonate with existing "public problems" in the
way
>dewey may have termed it).
>
>what might F offer in terms of social epistemology, political sociology
and
>practical political conversation?
>
>granted, "practical" is open for examination.
>
>\jude
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
How would you compare the work of JGA Pocock (and/or Q. Skinner?) to
what Foucault's approach to discourses? And is Pocock at all relevant
to your own purpose of discerning "practical political languages?"
MT
>From owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 19 08:07:35 1999
>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id KAA87637 for foucault-outgoing; Fri, 19 Feb 1999
10:32:54 -0500
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender
to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>Received: from mailbox.syr.edu (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [128.230.18.5]) by
lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA16460 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:32:48 -0500
>Received: from [128.230.151.72] (sudial0410-072.syr.edu
[128.230.151.72])
> by mailbox.syr.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA09934
> for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:32:44
-0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <v03007803b2f33220985e@[128.230.151.72]>
>In-Reply-To: <000701be5bf1$93c72360$845708c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:38:00 -0500
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>From: Jude Hollins <jlhollin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: epistemology & political sociology?
>Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>what does F's work offer epistemology and/or political sociology?
>
>three texts can frame this question for me, personally.
>
>habermas's _philosophical discourses_
>linda alcoff's _real knowing_
>thomas popkewitz's _political sociology of education reform_
>
>i suppose foucault's "what is enlightenment?" is a point of entrance
for
>me. discussion between butler, benhabib, and fraser (etc) certainly
has
>import.
>
>but, the question at the top is one i am trying to engage, having
specific
>"stakes". my own work involves contemporary education reform movements
and
>conversations.
>
>i wonder what others might think (and how they would translate such
thought
>into common tongue, and resonate with existing "public problems" in the
way
>dewey may have termed it).
>
>what might F offer in terms of social epistemology, political sociology
and
>practical political conversation?
>
>granted, "practical" is open for examination.
>
>\jude
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com