Re:Chomsky (fwd)

>Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 12:55:45 -0400 (EDT)
>Reply-To: philcamus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Originator: philcamus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sender: philcamus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>From: Philippe <marquette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Multiple recipients of list <philcamus@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re:Chomsky
>X-Comment: Discussions of the philosophical ideas of Albert Camus
>Mime-Version: 1.0

Realpolitik?
-k

>As Prof.Duquette put it, it is a geopolitical issue.
>Who is talking about a geopolitical issue may be talking about the
>control of The Balkans. In case a weak Elstsine [Yeltsin] government is
>defeated
>and Russians put back the Communists or a combination of hard-liners
>to power. The Russian government is living with the errors of Eltsine,
>notably in Tchetchenia, and an anarchic economy controlled by
>ex-bureaucrats and mafias who have made their kingdoms.
>In the event of a change of government in Russia which would be
>unfavorable to the West, and the possible return of Cold War,
>United States wants to insure the control of The Balkans.
>The problems of the Kosovars, which the war turned in catastrophy,
>were never really in the balance? It was a mere excuse? They could not
>give a damn if the Kosovars were trampled in the middle. This is playing
>on a geopolitical level, way over their heads.
>With the best intentions, I hope that I am wrong...
>
>Philippe
>



Partial thread listing: