This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-----Mensaje original-----
De: aarouxet <aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Para: cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:19 PM
Asunto: RV:=20
-----Mensaje original-----
De: aarouxet <aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Para: cameron duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cameron duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:16 PM
Hi Cameron
I start with a very stupid question, are you a woman or a man? I speak =
spanish, so I really can't imagine if it's a name for a man or for a =
woman.
Your response was wonderfull. Don't worry I'm not a specialist in =
Foucault's archeology. I'm just a student that is making her thesis on =
"le d=E9passement du sujet", I think that Foucault tried to separated =
from structuralism despite he agreed with it in this point. There are a =
lot of problems there, because the phenomenological school and the =
structuralist group are not homogeneous. Foucault was against the idea =
of a phenomenologist conscience , but the Husserl's Krisis and the idea =
of Leben has had influence on Foucault's work. I think that archeology =
is an addition of many influences, that remain in some way. Its is =
impossible to abridge the work that propose the archeology as a method =
in one or two pages. I beleive that the archeology is a response to the =
philosophical tradition. The problem is how to think after Hegel. If =
history and philosophy are over, what can we do? We have to make another =
history? The problem is discontinuity versus the Absolut? Discontinuity =
means nihilism? We think after the Nietzsche's sentence: there is no =
fact only an interpretation. Is this our postmodernism?=20
my thesis is a risk in many ways, I want to defend discontinuity, try to =
enlarge the philosophical horizon of archeology and to demostrate that =
there is no cut between archeology and geneology. I think that Foucault =
didn't abandon archeology, he enlarged the horizon. He abandoned the =
priority of discours, he put it in relation. That's the meaning of =
dispositif (cf. Dit et =E9crits, tomeIII, page 300-1)
My dear friend, I don't know if you are a philosopher or something else, =
I study philosophy, so I put the stress on philosophical problems.=20
I haven't read the book of Dreyfuss and Rabinow, because this is =
Argentina and we follow the european tradition. I'm going to ask my =
professor if he can lend me this book. I've gone to the university =
library this afternoon, but it wasn't there.=20
You live in Brisbane, don't you? So you live near the sea, you are =
really lucky boy or girl. When you look at the sea, the horizon seems to =
be enormous. It's the same efect of philosophy. An enormous horizon for =
mortal eyes.=20
I'm going to keep you posted, keep me posted too. Bye. Thank you.
=20
Andrea Arouxet
aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#b8b8b8>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Mensaje =
original-----</B><BR><B>De:=20
</B>aarouxet <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B=
>Para:=20
</B><A=20
href=3D"mailto:cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.=
au</A>=20
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.=
au</A>><BR><B>Fecha:=20
</B>Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:19 PM<BR><B>Asunto: </B>RV:=20
<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Mensaje =
original-----</B><BR><B>De:=20
</B>aarouxet <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B=
>Para:=20
</B>cameron <A =
href=3D"mailto:duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>=20
<cameron <A=20
href=3D"mailto:duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>=
<B>Fecha:=20
</B>Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:16 PM<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Hi Cameron</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>I start with a =
very stupid=20
question, are you a woman or a man? I speak spanish, so I really can't =
imagine=20
if it's a name for a man or for a woman.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Your response was wonderfull. Don't worry I'm not a =
specialist=20
in Foucault's archeology. I'm just a student that is making her thesis =
on=20
"le dépassement du sujet", I think that Foucault tried =
to=20
separated from structuralism despite he agreed with it in this point. =
There are=20
a lot of problems there, because the phenomenological school and the=20
structuralist group are not homogeneous. Foucault was against the idea =
of a=20
phenomenologist conscience , but the Husserl's Krisis and the idea of =
Leben has=20
had influence on Foucault's work. I think that archeology is an addition =
of many=20
influences, that remain in some way. Its is impossible to abridge the =
work that=20
propose the archeology as a method in one or two pages. I beleive that =
the=20
archeology is a response to the philosophical tradition. The problem is =
how to=20
think after Hegel. If history and philosophy are over, what can we do? =
We have=20
to make another history? The problem is discontinuity versus the =
Absolut?=20
Discontinuity means nihilism? We think after the Nietzsche's =
sentence:=20
there is no fact only an interpretation. Is this our postmodernism?=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>my thesis is a risk in many ways, I want to defend=20
discontinuity, try to enlarge the philosophical horizon of archeology =
and to=20
demostrate that there is no cut between archeology and geneology. I =
think that=20
Foucault didn't abandon archeology, he enlarged the horizon. He =
abandoned the=20
priority of discours, he put it in relation. That's the meaning of =
dispositif=20
(cf. Dit et écrits, tomeIII, page 300-1)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>My dear friend, I don't know if you are a =
philosopher or=20
something else, I study philosophy, so I put the stress on philosophical =
problems. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I haven't read the book of Dreyfuss and Rabinow, =
because this=20
is Argentina and we follow the european tradition. I'm going to ask my =
professor=20
if he can lend me this book. I've gone to the university library this =
afternoon,=20
but it wasn't there. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>You live in Brisbane, don't you? So you live near =
the sea, you=20
are really lucky boy or girl. When you look at the sea, the horizon =
seems to be=20
enormous. It's the same efect of philosophy. An enormous horizon for =
mortal=20
eyes. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I'm going to keep you posted, keep me posted too. =
Bye. Thank=20
you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Andrea Arouxet<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></D=
IV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0--
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
-----Mensaje original-----
De: aarouxet <aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Para: cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:19 PM
Asunto: RV:=20
-----Mensaje original-----
De: aarouxet <aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Para: cameron duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <cameron duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fecha: Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:16 PM
Hi Cameron
I start with a very stupid question, are you a woman or a man? I speak =
spanish, so I really can't imagine if it's a name for a man or for a =
woman.
Your response was wonderfull. Don't worry I'm not a specialist in =
Foucault's archeology. I'm just a student that is making her thesis on =
"le d=E9passement du sujet", I think that Foucault tried to separated =
from structuralism despite he agreed with it in this point. There are a =
lot of problems there, because the phenomenological school and the =
structuralist group are not homogeneous. Foucault was against the idea =
of a phenomenologist conscience , but the Husserl's Krisis and the idea =
of Leben has had influence on Foucault's work. I think that archeology =
is an addition of many influences, that remain in some way. Its is =
impossible to abridge the work that propose the archeology as a method =
in one or two pages. I beleive that the archeology is a response to the =
philosophical tradition. The problem is how to think after Hegel. If =
history and philosophy are over, what can we do? We have to make another =
history? The problem is discontinuity versus the Absolut? Discontinuity =
means nihilism? We think after the Nietzsche's sentence: there is no =
fact only an interpretation. Is this our postmodernism?=20
my thesis is a risk in many ways, I want to defend discontinuity, try to =
enlarge the philosophical horizon of archeology and to demostrate that =
there is no cut between archeology and geneology. I think that Foucault =
didn't abandon archeology, he enlarged the horizon. He abandoned the =
priority of discours, he put it in relation. That's the meaning of =
dispositif (cf. Dit et =E9crits, tomeIII, page 300-1)
My dear friend, I don't know if you are a philosopher or something else, =
I study philosophy, so I put the stress on philosophical problems.=20
I haven't read the book of Dreyfuss and Rabinow, because this is =
Argentina and we follow the european tradition. I'm going to ask my =
professor if he can lend me this book. I've gone to the university =
library this afternoon, but it wasn't there.=20
You live in Brisbane, don't you? So you live near the sea, you are =
really lucky boy or girl. When you look at the sea, the horizon seems to =
be enormous. It's the same efect of philosophy. An enormous horizon for =
mortal eyes.=20
I'm going to keep you posted, keep me posted too. Bye. Thank you.
=20
Andrea Arouxet
aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 =
HTML//EN"><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#b8b8b8>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Mensaje =
original-----</B><BR><B>De:=20
</B>aarouxet <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B=
>Para:=20
</B><A=20
href=3D"mailto:cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.=
au</A>=20
<<A=20
href=3D"mailto:cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>cameronduff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.=
au</A>><BR><B>Fecha:=20
</B>Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:19 PM<BR><B>Asunto: </B>RV:=20
<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><B>-----Mensaje =
original-----</B><BR><B>De:=20
</B>aarouxet <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR><B=
>Para:=20
</B>cameron <A =
href=3D"mailto:duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>=20
<cameron <A=20
href=3D"mailto:duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>duff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</A>><BR>=
<B>Fecha:=20
</B>Viernes 20 de Agosto de 1999 11:16 PM<BR><BR></DIV></FONT>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Hi Cameron</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT size=3D2>I start with a =
very stupid=20
question, are you a woman or a man? I speak spanish, so I really can't =
imagine=20
if it's a name for a man or for a woman.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Your response was wonderfull. Don't worry I'm not a =
specialist=20
in Foucault's archeology. I'm just a student that is making her thesis =
on=20
"le dépassement du sujet", I think that Foucault tried =
to=20
separated from structuralism despite he agreed with it in this point. =
There are=20
a lot of problems there, because the phenomenological school and the=20
structuralist group are not homogeneous. Foucault was against the idea =
of a=20
phenomenologist conscience , but the Husserl's Krisis and the idea of =
Leben has=20
had influence on Foucault's work. I think that archeology is an addition =
of many=20
influences, that remain in some way. Its is impossible to abridge the =
work that=20
propose the archeology as a method in one or two pages. I beleive that =
the=20
archeology is a response to the philosophical tradition. The problem is =
how to=20
think after Hegel. If history and philosophy are over, what can we do? =
We have=20
to make another history? The problem is discontinuity versus the =
Absolut?=20
Discontinuity means nihilism? We think after the Nietzsche's =
sentence:=20
there is no fact only an interpretation. Is this our postmodernism?=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>my thesis is a risk in many ways, I want to defend=20
discontinuity, try to enlarge the philosophical horizon of archeology =
and to=20
demostrate that there is no cut between archeology and geneology. I =
think that=20
Foucault didn't abandon archeology, he enlarged the horizon. He =
abandoned the=20
priority of discours, he put it in relation. That's the meaning of =
dispositif=20
(cf. Dit et écrits, tomeIII, page 300-1)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>My dear friend, I don't know if you are a =
philosopher or=20
something else, I study philosophy, so I put the stress on philosophical =
problems. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I haven't read the book of Dreyfuss and Rabinow, =
because this=20
is Argentina and we follow the european tradition. I'm going to ask my =
professor=20
if he can lend me this book. I've gone to the university library this =
afternoon,=20
but it wasn't there. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>You live in Brisbane, don't you? So you live near =
the sea, you=20
are really lucky boy or girl. When you look at the sea, the horizon =
seems to be=20
enormous. It's the same efect of philosophy. An enormous horizon for =
mortal=20
eyes. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I'm going to keep you posted, keep me posted too. =
Bye. Thank=20
you.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Andrea Arouxet<BR><A=20
href=3D"mailto:aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx";>aarouxet@xxxxxxxxxxxx</A></FONT></D=
IV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0052_01BEEB62.FCC2CDA0--