In a message dated 05/20/2000 2:04:16 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
ahaig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< The point is not that
nothing is observable, but that our interpretations are constructed based on
our existing knowledge/understanding, which is always arbitrary. >>
so then the point is that it's not a question of whether or not there is
truth, but that we can only approach truth with the bias of our limitations
of knowing, that we can only approach the truth (I want to say the Real)
asymptotically? further, that there is truth that we can observe, which is
different from truth that we interpret?
jb...
ahaig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<< The point is not that
nothing is observable, but that our interpretations are constructed based on
our existing knowledge/understanding, which is always arbitrary. >>
so then the point is that it's not a question of whether or not there is
truth, but that we can only approach truth with the bias of our limitations
of knowing, that we can only approach the truth (I want to say the Real)
asymptotically? further, that there is truth that we can observe, which is
different from truth that we interpret?
jb...