You didn't ask him about vegetarians or the IMF. I suspect the list of
seemingly random and unelaborated opinions could be extended indefinitely.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Goralnik" <rhizome85@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Foucault" <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:52 AM
> So Rorty says he became too "disaffected" to keep teaching Foucault. He
> thinks Foucault is "politically useless." He agrees with me that Alan
Sokal
> is an idiot and that Douglas Kellner maybe isn't qualified to write the
> books he's writing. He thinks Lacan's project is kind of worthless, and
> isn't too into Kristeva or Deleuze and Guattari. He didn't disagree with
me
> that Nussbaum is crap. He's pro-choice.
>
> ~Nate
>
> --
>
> "The living body is a loving body, and the loving
> body is a speaking body. Without love we are nothing
> but walking corpses. Love is essential to the living
> body, and it is essential in bringing the living
> body to life in language." ~Kelly Oliver
>
>
seemingly random and unelaborated opinions could be extended indefinitely.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathan Goralnik" <rhizome85@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Foucault" <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 9:52 AM
> So Rorty says he became too "disaffected" to keep teaching Foucault. He
> thinks Foucault is "politically useless." He agrees with me that Alan
Sokal
> is an idiot and that Douglas Kellner maybe isn't qualified to write the
> books he's writing. He thinks Lacan's project is kind of worthless, and
> isn't too into Kristeva or Deleuze and Guattari. He didn't disagree with
me
> that Nussbaum is crap. He's pro-choice.
>
> ~Nate
>
> --
>
> "The living body is a loving body, and the loving
> body is a speaking body. Without love we are nothing
> but walking corpses. Love is essential to the living
> body, and it is essential in bringing the living
> body to life in language." ~Kelly Oliver
>
>