Re:

Oh, Yes!That, what you say, is absolutely correct. And
that is the breakdown of the pragmatists.They cannot
invent. Therefor they are not filosofers.
--- Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How's his prostate ;-)? No, serious, it seems to me
> that he's loosing
> the inventiveness to use others thoughts, which to
> me is one of the most
> essential capabilities a philospher needs.
>
> erik
>
> Nathan Goralnik wrote:
>
> > So Rorty says he became too "disaffected" to keep
> teaching Foucault. He
> > thinks Foucault is "politically useless." He
> agrees with me that Alan Sokal
> > is an idiot and that Douglas Kellner maybe isn't
> qualified to write the
> > books he's writing. He thinks Lacan's project is
> kind of worthless, and
> > isn't too into Kristeva or Deleuze and Guattari.
> He didn't disagree with me
> > that Nussbaum is crap. He's pro-choice.
> >
> > ~Nate
> >
> > --
> >
> > "The living body is a loving body, and the loving
> > body is a speaking body. Without love we are
> nothing
> > but walking corpses. Love is essential to the
> living
> > body, and it is essential in bringing the living
> > body to life in language." ~Kelly Oliver
> >
> >
> >
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Partial thread listing: