heidegger-dialognet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
sartre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- "Christine E. Alfery" <cealfery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Could someone post to the list the Heidegger list
> and the Sartre list
> address. Thanx. c
>
> At 11:57 AM 5/18/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >The Haiddeger List is a smashing good place indeed,
> >and sartre also.
> >--- sop01bsc@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Quoting Stuart Elden <stuart.elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Dear Larry,
> >>
> >> could you indicate the adress of the Heidegger
> list
> >> to me - I am interested in
> >> joining.
> >>
> >> Tanks
> >>
> >> Dr. Brunhilde Schweizer
> >>
> >>
> >> > Larry
> >> >
> >> > Whilst I don't necessarily agree with
> everything
> >> you said, I appreciate
> >> > the
> >> > post which I can only hope will lead to some
> more
> >> thought before posting
> >> > to
> >> > this list.
> >> >
> >> > I despair of this list regularly. Compared to
> the
> >> parallel Heidegger
> >> > list,
> >> > which i've been on for a similar amount of time
> >> (over 4 years) the level
> >> > of
> >> > discussion is depressing. There are some very
> >> juvenile and ill-informed
> >> > conversations here... but i stay around.
> Probably
> >> because occasionally
> >> > something good happens, and i've met some very
> >> interesting and useful
> >> > people
> >> > through the list.
> >> >
> >> > That said, for a serious discussion of a
> difficult
> >> text -
> >> > L'hermeneutique du
> >> > sujet - I've set up a separate, private,
> >> distribution list. It's hardly
> >> > resistance to 'aggressive stupidity that causes
> >> 'harm' ", but i can't
> >> > fight
> >> > everything that annoys me. So many times i've
> >> started a reply to an
> >> > issue
> >> > here, and then thought better of it. I don't
> have
> >> time to engage with
> >> > every
> >> > issue, and particularly not to engage in the
> >> back-and-forth it invokes.
> >> > Elsewhere when i gave up on a debate i felt was
> >> going nowhere I was
> >> > accused
> >> > of wriggling out of it. Sometimes I just have
> to
> >> turn away.
> >> >
> >> > Best
> >> >
> >> > Stuart
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From:
> owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >
> >>
> [mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> >> Behalf Of Larry
> >> > > Chappell
> >> > > Sent: 04 May 2001 11:43
> >> > > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > Cc: Bernard Bray
> >> > > Subject: Taylor on Foucault and the ethics of
> >> reading and writing
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Brunhilde S. Schweizer
> >> 131, Providence Square
> >> London SE1 2ED
> >> Tel + Fax 020 7252777
> >> email sop01bsc
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> >http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
sartre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- "Christine E. Alfery" <cealfery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Could someone post to the list the Heidegger list
> and the Sartre list
> address. Thanx. c
>
> At 11:57 AM 5/18/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >The Haiddeger List is a smashing good place indeed,
> >and sartre also.
> >--- sop01bsc@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Quoting Stuart Elden <stuart.elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Dear Larry,
> >>
> >> could you indicate the adress of the Heidegger
> list
> >> to me - I am interested in
> >> joining.
> >>
> >> Tanks
> >>
> >> Dr. Brunhilde Schweizer
> >>
> >>
> >> > Larry
> >> >
> >> > Whilst I don't necessarily agree with
> everything
> >> you said, I appreciate
> >> > the
> >> > post which I can only hope will lead to some
> more
> >> thought before posting
> >> > to
> >> > this list.
> >> >
> >> > I despair of this list regularly. Compared to
> the
> >> parallel Heidegger
> >> > list,
> >> > which i've been on for a similar amount of time
> >> (over 4 years) the level
> >> > of
> >> > discussion is depressing. There are some very
> >> juvenile and ill-informed
> >> > conversations here... but i stay around.
> Probably
> >> because occasionally
> >> > something good happens, and i've met some very
> >> interesting and useful
> >> > people
> >> > through the list.
> >> >
> >> > That said, for a serious discussion of a
> difficult
> >> text -
> >> > L'hermeneutique du
> >> > sujet - I've set up a separate, private,
> >> distribution list. It's hardly
> >> > resistance to 'aggressive stupidity that causes
> >> 'harm' ", but i can't
> >> > fight
> >> > everything that annoys me. So many times i've
> >> started a reply to an
> >> > issue
> >> > here, and then thought better of it. I don't
> have
> >> time to engage with
> >> > every
> >> > issue, and particularly not to engage in the
> >> back-and-forth it invokes.
> >> > Elsewhere when i gave up on a debate i felt was
> >> going nowhere I was
> >> > accused
> >> > of wriggling out of it. Sometimes I just have
> to
> >> turn away.
> >> >
> >> > Best
> >> >
> >> > Stuart
> >> >
> >> > > -----Original Message-----
> >> > > From:
> owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >
> >>
> [mailto:owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> >> Behalf Of Larry
> >> > > Chappell
> >> > > Sent: 04 May 2001 11:43
> >> > > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > Cc: Bernard Bray
> >> > > Subject: Taylor on Foucault and the ethics of
> >> reading and writing
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Brunhilde S. Schweizer
> >> 131, Providence Square
> >> London SE1 2ED
> >> Tel + Fax 020 7252777
> >> email sop01bsc
> >
> >
> >__________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great
> prices
> >http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/