Jivco writ:
>arent knowledge much like conscious? Dont You rather
>mean the "historical unconscious"?
knowledge, for the unconscious rose that has no "why" let's say, fills the
rose, else there would be no rose, and with no
unconscious-of-their-knowledge roses then where the hell would we be
dashing off to on valentines day, ay?
you too can feel this knowledge in every fibre of your body, altho, in the
strictest sense, this body is not "your" body, "you" don't exist outside
grammar. i.e. "your" govt issued id card is a fake (a poor shadow, that
struts and frets its hour upon the stage, and then, etc.)
regarde,
-k