Im realy confused! I cant believe none in this group
is able to say something about the notion for
l'enonce.
Even Stuart Elden!
Is it that difficult?
Im realy strucked...
Jivko
--- Jivko Georgiev <jivkox43georgiev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all!
> In your opinion, is there some kind of connection,
> or
> relation, or influence between the theory of
> l'enonce
> (of Foucault) and The Being (of Heiddeger)? It seems
> to me that the theory of l'enonce is influenced by
> Heidegger, because the being of H. is somehow
> non-personal, anonymous and is previous in its
> relation with the concrete things.
> So is l'enonce of Foucault: it is non-personal
> ,previous and is nessecary sircumstance for any
> serie
> of sighns to recieve understandable shape.
>
> In general, this theory reminds me of Heidegger.
> Please, let me know about your opinion! Ill
> appreciate
> it alot!
> Ofcourse, i cant pay you for your opinion, but if
> you
> insist, we can do something about it:-)))))))
>
> Regards!
> Jivko
>
>
> --- "Hennon, Lisa" <hennon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Lionel, you ask great questions. I enjoy how
> others
> > have responded. Here
> > is what I think. Foucault's popularity and
> > notoriety has much to do with
> > what his intellectual contribution enabled others
> to
> > do. I first read
> > Foucault by stumbling across one of his books in
> the
> > library. I had never
> > heard of him, nor did I know how to say his name;
> > the title grabbed my
> > attention--The Order of Things. (At the time, I
> > wanted somebody to please
> > tell me how things are ordered.)
> >
> > Fortunately (or not) for me, his work was
> beginning
> > to be translated into
> > English, and one of my professors later explained
> > that numerous European
> > authors were not made available to American
> readers
> > until the 1960s-70s.
> > Foucault remains a "notorious" figure for many
> > American university teachers
> > because their colleagues picked up his work as a
> way
> > to change the debates
> > in higher education. The conversation has moved
> > away from Foucault's
> > detractors, so they talk about the "loss" or
> > "decline" or "grade inflation"
> > or whatever other term that suggests how dangerous
> > it is to read Foucault
> > and the other "french guys".
> >
> > Lisa
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lionel Boxer [mailto:lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:30 PM
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Foucault's popularity
> >
> >
> > Does anyone agree with this? Does anyone
> disagree?
> >
> > Not to diminish Foucault's intellectucal
> > contribution.
> >
> > Perhaps his popularity could be explained by his
> > proactive and high profile
> > social activism that contributed to his
> popularity.
> >
> > He provided theory and practice for resistance,
> but
> > more important he led by
> >
> > example. He was a total force in that regard;
> > perhaps even a movement.
> >
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com
is able to say something about the notion for
l'enonce.
Even Stuart Elden!
Is it that difficult?
Im realy strucked...
Jivko
--- Jivko Georgiev <jivkox43georgiev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all!
> In your opinion, is there some kind of connection,
> or
> relation, or influence between the theory of
> l'enonce
> (of Foucault) and The Being (of Heiddeger)? It seems
> to me that the theory of l'enonce is influenced by
> Heidegger, because the being of H. is somehow
> non-personal, anonymous and is previous in its
> relation with the concrete things.
> So is l'enonce of Foucault: it is non-personal
> ,previous and is nessecary sircumstance for any
> serie
> of sighns to recieve understandable shape.
>
> In general, this theory reminds me of Heidegger.
> Please, let me know about your opinion! Ill
> appreciate
> it alot!
> Ofcourse, i cant pay you for your opinion, but if
> you
> insist, we can do something about it:-)))))))
>
> Regards!
> Jivko
>
>
> --- "Hennon, Lisa" <hennon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Lionel, you ask great questions. I enjoy how
> others
> > have responded. Here
> > is what I think. Foucault's popularity and
> > notoriety has much to do with
> > what his intellectual contribution enabled others
> to
> > do. I first read
> > Foucault by stumbling across one of his books in
> the
> > library. I had never
> > heard of him, nor did I know how to say his name;
> > the title grabbed my
> > attention--The Order of Things. (At the time, I
> > wanted somebody to please
> > tell me how things are ordered.)
> >
> > Fortunately (or not) for me, his work was
> beginning
> > to be translated into
> > English, and one of my professors later explained
> > that numerous European
> > authors were not made available to American
> readers
> > until the 1960s-70s.
> > Foucault remains a "notorious" figure for many
> > American university teachers
> > because their colleagues picked up his work as a
> way
> > to change the debates
> > in higher education. The conversation has moved
> > away from Foucault's
> > detractors, so they talk about the "loss" or
> > "decline" or "grade inflation"
> > or whatever other term that suggests how dangerous
> > it is to read Foucault
> > and the other "french guys".
> >
> > Lisa
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lionel Boxer [mailto:lboxer@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:30 PM
> > To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Foucault's popularity
> >
> >
> > Does anyone agree with this? Does anyone
> disagree?
> >
> > Not to diminish Foucault's intellectucal
> > contribution.
> >
> > Perhaps his popularity could be explained by his
> > proactive and high profile
> > social activism that contributed to his
> popularity.
> >
> > He provided theory and practice for resistance,
> but
> > more important he led by
> >
> > example. He was a total force in that regard;
> > perhaps even a movement.
> >
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Find a job, post your resume.
http://careers.yahoo.com