thanks Clare
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clare O'Farrell" <panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Le pouvoir psychiatrique
> Yes, the source is Le pouvoir psychiatrique, Cours au College de
> France, 1973-1974, Paris: Gallimard Seuil, 2003, p.17n
>
> >is there a proper source for quote?
> > > "we should not use the notion of state apparatus, because it is much
too
> >> large, much too abstract to indicate these immediate, miniscule,
capillary
> >> powers, which are exercised over bodies, the behaviour, gestures, and
> >times
> >> of individuals. The state apparatus doesn't take account of this
> >microphysic
> > > of power' (PP 17 n. *).
>
> --
> Clare
> ************************************************
> Clare O'Farrell
> email: panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.foucault.qut.edu.au
> ************************************************
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Clare O'Farrell" <panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Le pouvoir psychiatrique
> Yes, the source is Le pouvoir psychiatrique, Cours au College de
> France, 1973-1974, Paris: Gallimard Seuil, 2003, p.17n
>
> >is there a proper source for quote?
> > > "we should not use the notion of state apparatus, because it is much
too
> >> large, much too abstract to indicate these immediate, miniscule,
capillary
> >> powers, which are exercised over bodies, the behaviour, gestures, and
> >times
> >> of individuals. The state apparatus doesn't take account of this
> >microphysic
> > > of power' (PP 17 n. *).
>
> --
> Clare
> ************************************************
> Clare O'Farrell
> email: panoptique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.foucault.qut.edu.au
> ************************************************
>