it is quite a while since i have posed a question to the list, and a lot of new people have joined since then. so, i would first like to say hello and welcome.
i have been reading a number of texts by foucault which discuss kant's reflections on enlightenment and revolution, and have also been reading some secondary commentary - by gordon, dean, and so on - which discuss these texts by foucault. this has left me somewhat confused, and my confusion runs as follows:
does foucault use the phrase "historical ontology" as a kind of synonym for genealogy; or are archaeology and genealogy the method and design of historical ontology. to put the question slightly differently, what is the relationship between archaeology and genealogy on the one hand, and historical ontology on the other?
regards - kevin.
----------------------------------------------------
laid by the gate at the foot of the garden my view stretches out from the fence to the wall
no words could explain no action determine just watching the trees and the leaves as they fall
(Ian Curtis)
i have been reading a number of texts by foucault which discuss kant's reflections on enlightenment and revolution, and have also been reading some secondary commentary - by gordon, dean, and so on - which discuss these texts by foucault. this has left me somewhat confused, and my confusion runs as follows:
does foucault use the phrase "historical ontology" as a kind of synonym for genealogy; or are archaeology and genealogy the method and design of historical ontology. to put the question slightly differently, what is the relationship between archaeology and genealogy on the one hand, and historical ontology on the other?
regards - kevin.
----------------------------------------------------
laid by the gate at the foot of the garden my view stretches out from the fence to the wall
no words could explain no action determine just watching the trees and the leaves as they fall
(Ian Curtis)