People generally start with the following book:
Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault's Methods and Historical Sociology
by Mitchell Dean
Synopsis
This book places Foucault's methodologies against central currents in social theory and philosophy in order to provide a guide to doing historical sociology in particular and social sciences more generally. It is written for several reasons. First, it seeks to make Foucault's contribution comprehensible to a wide range of professional and non-professional readers. Second, it rescues the originality and usefulness of Foucault's work, and his critical project from both the welter of ill-informed criticism and the obfuscation of sympathetic commentators. Third, it embodies a conviction that Foucault's approaches could inform the metamorphosis of sociology into an effective, open-ended, multi-focused, relevant discipline, capable of problematising the grand frameworks and assumptions of earlier social theory. Finally, it demonstrates that Foucault's methods provide the necessary condition for any state-of- the-art social research today. The book thus addresses the many formulations of Foucault's methodological position and seeks to establish its relation to such figures as Nietzsche, Kant, Weber, Elias, Habermas, Giddens and the Annales and Frankfurt Schools. Futhermore, it explores the itnerconnected substantive themes of Foucault's work: truth, knowledge and rationality; power, domination and government; and the self and ethical practice. The book is less a commentary on Foucault than a use of Foucault's methods to chart an original position on the condition of social science today. It is directed not only to readers interested in Foucault's legacy but to any social scientist or student working at the cutting edge of contemporary research and to the non-professional audience concerned with the central, ethical, political, and theoretical problems of our time.
Info taken from http://www.amazon.co.uk/Critical-Effective-Histories- Foucaults-Historical/dp/0415064953/
You might also find that Foucault's concepts have been filtered through the work of Giddens, such as The Nation-State and Violence: A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: v. 2
On 10/05/2007, at 9:27 AM, Ilgin Yorukoglu wrote:
Critical and Effective Histories: Foucault's Methods and Historical Sociology
by Mitchell Dean
Synopsis
This book places Foucault's methodologies against central currents in social theory and philosophy in order to provide a guide to doing historical sociology in particular and social sciences more generally. It is written for several reasons. First, it seeks to make Foucault's contribution comprehensible to a wide range of professional and non-professional readers. Second, it rescues the originality and usefulness of Foucault's work, and his critical project from both the welter of ill-informed criticism and the obfuscation of sympathetic commentators. Third, it embodies a conviction that Foucault's approaches could inform the metamorphosis of sociology into an effective, open-ended, multi-focused, relevant discipline, capable of problematising the grand frameworks and assumptions of earlier social theory. Finally, it demonstrates that Foucault's methods provide the necessary condition for any state-of- the-art social research today. The book thus addresses the many formulations of Foucault's methodological position and seeks to establish its relation to such figures as Nietzsche, Kant, Weber, Elias, Habermas, Giddens and the Annales and Frankfurt Schools. Futhermore, it explores the itnerconnected substantive themes of Foucault's work: truth, knowledge and rationality; power, domination and government; and the self and ethical practice. The book is less a commentary on Foucault than a use of Foucault's methods to chart an original position on the condition of social science today. It is directed not only to readers interested in Foucault's legacy but to any social scientist or student working at the cutting edge of contemporary research and to the non-professional audience concerned with the central, ethical, political, and theoretical problems of our time.
Info taken from http://www.amazon.co.uk/Critical-Effective-Histories- Foucaults-Historical/dp/0415064953/
You might also find that Foucault's concepts have been filtered through the work of Giddens, such as The Nation-State and Violence: A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism: v. 2
On 10/05/2007, at 9:27 AM, Ilgin Yorukoglu wrote:
Greetings everyone,
I am working (well, at this point just stressing out myself actually) on the influence and role of Foucault on recent historical sociological works- with a specific focus on the notion of power.
I believe Foucault has been very influential in such works on state formation, punishment etc. Yet, many times he is not cited (I have in mind Michael Mann's hundreds of pg. work on the source of social power, in which he doesn't cite Foucault even once), or other times, I believe, he's often misinterpreted and criticized based on this misinterpretation.
Any suggestion, idea, thought will be very much appreciated.
Many thanks beforehand,
Ilgin
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Foucault-L mailing list