I was asked to reply, but there was no message, so I'M replying.
------------------
------------------
reply
- From: TKWILSON@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 14:09:49 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: reply
- Previous by thread: Re: paglia vs foucault?
- Next by thread: >Habermas is Habermas, 'nough said.
Partial thread listing:
- reply, TKWILSON
- >Habermas is Habermas, 'nough said.,
Samuel Lawrence Binkley (1996-03-11)
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: >Habermas is Habermas, 'nough said., Bryan A. Alexander
- Re: >Habermas is Habermas, 'nough said., Parker Douglas
- Re: >Habermas is Habermas, 'nough said., Joe Cronin