Actually, I guess we don't really need another list, it's just that this
list has gotten so huge (I've been reviewing my e-mail for the last 20
minutes). I think that if we agree to all use the same subject for
messages concerning the 'foucault roundtable' that should make it easier
for people who are not involved to delete our messages.
On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, DERRICK ALLUMS wrote:
> Chris,
> What are your good reasons for wanting another list? It seems
> that much (if not most) of the activity at this point on this one concerns
> the roundtable idea. Besides, the name of the list makes it easy for
> newcomers to find us, non?
>
> curiously,
> dda
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, Chris Allert wrote:
>
> > The 'cyber reading group' sounds like a good idea. Should we start a
> > different listserv for it? (I'm feeling a little overwhealmed with
> > messages from this list at the moment)
> >
>
------------------
list has gotten so huge (I've been reviewing my e-mail for the last 20
minutes). I think that if we agree to all use the same subject for
messages concerning the 'foucault roundtable' that should make it easier
for people who are not involved to delete our messages.
On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, DERRICK ALLUMS wrote:
> Chris,
> What are your good reasons for wanting another list? It seems
> that much (if not most) of the activity at this point on this one concerns
> the roundtable idea. Besides, the name of the list makes it easy for
> newcomers to find us, non?
>
> curiously,
> dda
>
> On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, Chris Allert wrote:
>
> > The 'cyber reading group' sounds like a good idea. Should we start a
> > different listserv for it? (I'm feeling a little overwhealmed with
> > messages from this list at the moment)
> >
>
------------------