Re: Kant, Hegel, Hitler

On Fri, 15 Mar 1996, jln wrote:
>
> I'm not saying that
> >because of this gap, Joe's point is false, just that it isn't made. I in
> >fact think it totally false to make the conneciotn that Joe made, but I'm
> >at a loss at howe to proceed. In general, with respect to the issue of
> >responding to fascism, I'm not interested too much in debate. I have a
> >small amount of expereince in community responses to street level nazis
> >and white supremacists, and dialogue of any kind was never on the agenda,
> >never mind trying to create a space in which to describe the liberating
> >consequences of the categorical imperative.
>
> This sounds like a logical fallacy to me: it's called a red herring or a
> proof surrogate. What's your point? What kind of experience? If your not
> interested in debate, then why are you debating?
>
With respect to that claim, I am very interested in debating you guys.
It's the boneheads that I wont debate. The "experience" was preventing
the nazis from demonstrating in celebration of white pride on Hitler's
birthday. There was no question of debate, or accomodation. They ran
away.
Antoine

------------------

Partial thread listing: