At 15:23 10/05/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
> I do not take offense at my response being labeled
>"anti-intellectual," nor at the suggestion that I might be missing
>something fundamental about the nature of the philosophical project.
>Rather, I take on Din's challenge of a slow reading of the first chapter
>or two of Butler's newest (as I have not, as Din noted and I stated in a
>previous response, read a single word of it). Anyone care to accompany
>me? I should hope, Din, that you will be there for me throughout this
>adventure into the intellectual and philosophical.
>
>derrick
>
I would be most interested in such a reading of Butler's work. When shall we
start?
John Banks
J.Banks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I do not take offense at my response being labeled
>"anti-intellectual," nor at the suggestion that I might be missing
>something fundamental about the nature of the philosophical project.
>Rather, I take on Din's challenge of a slow reading of the first chapter
>or two of Butler's newest (as I have not, as Din noted and I stated in a
>previous response, read a single word of it). Anyone care to accompany
>me? I should hope, Din, that you will be there for me throughout this
>adventure into the intellectual and philosophical.
>
>derrick
>
I would be most interested in such a reading of Butler's work. When shall we
start?
John Banks
J.Banks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx