Diane,
F. wrote a neglected book (which he himself did not
think high about it later) on Raymond Rousell. It is not
the best example of clarity, but he deals in that book with the nature
of Language in connection with an all too mad author. His arguments there
throw an interesting light on his discussion of representation in 'les mots et les
choses'. It's not the obvious choice, but odd ones have their own charm.
-------------
Gabriel Ash
Notre-Dame
-------------
F. wrote a neglected book (which he himself did not
think high about it later) on Raymond Rousell. It is not
the best example of clarity, but he deals in that book with the nature
of Language in connection with an all too mad author. His arguments there
throw an interesting light on his discussion of representation in 'les mots et les
choses'. It's not the obvious choice, but odd ones have their own charm.
-------------
Gabriel Ash
Notre-Dame
-------------