Well If Spivak "accused" Fou and Deleuze of projecting, then I
believe she was mistaken. Just As I think she/he is mistaken in her
writing about Wordsworth and so many of the other European authors she
has "projected" onto herself. (She is a she is she not/ Anyhow one
pronoun is like another). Deleuze projecting ? What nonsense - too
sensitive about the issues to fall into such a trap - he in fact was more
to the left than Fou. If one can say that about a Man who supported the
iranian revolution. ANd I remember when his articles first started
surfacing. Everyone had a feeling of a new hope at the time, the birth of
another possibility, another episteme if you will. The episteme of revolt
and violence and possibility and and and
this is just a moment in the screen of my dialetic as it passes
and moves through the turning page of herstory as she is written and syung.
To bricolage Joyce slightly.
Cd.
On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, daniel makagon wrote:
> I think the question is whether or not you are discussing Spivak's use of
> the term "epistemic violence" or Foucault's use of the term. If memeory
> serves me correct Spivak accused F. and Deleuze (_Can the Subaltern
> Speak_) of committing epistemic violence because they were projecting a white
> European epistemology onto the rest of the world (esp. third world). If
> that's the case then we may be barking upthe wrong tree trying to find
> quotes in F.'s writings. I don't know if that helps or opens an entirely
> different can of worms. Take care.
>
> Daniel
>
believe she was mistaken. Just As I think she/he is mistaken in her
writing about Wordsworth and so many of the other European authors she
has "projected" onto herself. (She is a she is she not/ Anyhow one
pronoun is like another). Deleuze projecting ? What nonsense - too
sensitive about the issues to fall into such a trap - he in fact was more
to the left than Fou. If one can say that about a Man who supported the
iranian revolution. ANd I remember when his articles first started
surfacing. Everyone had a feeling of a new hope at the time, the birth of
another possibility, another episteme if you will. The episteme of revolt
and violence and possibility and and and
this is just a moment in the screen of my dialetic as it passes
and moves through the turning page of herstory as she is written and syung.
To bricolage Joyce slightly.
Cd.
On Mon, 24 Mar 1997, daniel makagon wrote:
> I think the question is whether or not you are discussing Spivak's use of
> the term "epistemic violence" or Foucault's use of the term. If memeory
> serves me correct Spivak accused F. and Deleuze (_Can the Subaltern
> Speak_) of committing epistemic violence because they were projecting a white
> European epistemology onto the rest of the world (esp. third world). If
> that's the case then we may be barking upthe wrong tree trying to find
> quotes in F.'s writings. I don't know if that helps or opens an entirely
> different can of worms. Take care.
>
> Daniel
>