Rosemary:
Not to worry, gave us an opportunity to chat about this issue. Whenever
you have a chance, send me a note. To the list: Anybody else interested
in public (collective, social, etc.) memory? Does Foucault make specific
observations about a difference between History and memory?
Thanks,
N. Cordova
cordova@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Rosemary Jedel wrote:
> NACHO, Stephen, Malogosia. . .
>
> Just wanted to say thanks for the feedback on counter-memory. Sorry for
> dropping the ball; I'm super busy right now and am sort of out of the E-mail
> loop, but I'm still interested in the discourse. Nacho, did the discussion
> go private; I thought there were some responses to messages I've yet to
> read. Pardon the silent perusing on this end til things slow down in my
> world. . .
>
> Also, I seem to have zapped the posting for papers on memory. Would someone
> please send it my way once more?? <jedel.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks.
>
> Rosemary
>
>
>
>
>
> "The era of digital technology is simply a
> continuation of the Enlightenment, that splendid
> rebirth of Greco-Roman science currently vilified by
> the callow, word-obsessed post-structuralists and
> their postmodernist pups. I look for revelation not to
> that overrated nerd, Michel Foucault, but Star Trek,
> our prophetic, multicultural saga of a universe where
> men and machines live in beautiful, elegant intimacy."
> -- Camille Paglia, "The Internet and Sexual Personae,"
> Forbes.
>
>
Not to worry, gave us an opportunity to chat about this issue. Whenever
you have a chance, send me a note. To the list: Anybody else interested
in public (collective, social, etc.) memory? Does Foucault make specific
observations about a difference between History and memory?
Thanks,
N. Cordova
cordova@xxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Rosemary Jedel wrote:
> NACHO, Stephen, Malogosia. . .
>
> Just wanted to say thanks for the feedback on counter-memory. Sorry for
> dropping the ball; I'm super busy right now and am sort of out of the E-mail
> loop, but I'm still interested in the discourse. Nacho, did the discussion
> go private; I thought there were some responses to messages I've yet to
> read. Pardon the silent perusing on this end til things slow down in my
> world. . .
>
> Also, I seem to have zapped the posting for papers on memory. Would someone
> please send it my way once more?? <jedel.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Thanks.
>
> Rosemary
>
>
>
>
>
> "The era of digital technology is simply a
> continuation of the Enlightenment, that splendid
> rebirth of Greco-Roman science currently vilified by
> the callow, word-obsessed post-structuralists and
> their postmodernist pups. I look for revelation not to
> that overrated nerd, Michel Foucault, but Star Trek,
> our prophetic, multicultural saga of a universe where
> men and machines live in beautiful, elegant intimacy."
> -- Camille Paglia, "The Internet and Sexual Personae,"
> Forbes.
>
>