> <<Back to square one I suppose. I don't even think this is the best, or only
> reading of Foucualt's notion of truth. But if it is, does this mean that the
> powerful possess the most truths? And if not why not?>>
>
Its not the powerful who possess the mosts truths but the truth which
possesses the powerful. But this of course still begs the question of
what is truth? A mobile army perhaps? Ah, but for that one would have to
consult the spirit of gravity.
Flannon