I used F's notion of the statement as a way into the object
of my dissertation research (a piece of legislation). I found
Carole Blair's work particularly helpful:
Blair, Carole. ÒThe Statement: Foundation of FoucaultÕs Historical
Criticism.Ó Western Journal of Speech Communication 51 (1987): 364-83.
On 22 Sept, Daniel Vukovich wrote:
>My own query: can anyone point me to any essays, chapters, long
>passages on
>F's use of the statement/enonce? What he means by this, its originality
>and useage in F, anyone who has picked up and used this particular bit of
>F.? Dreyfus and Rabinow (who, as far as I know, have written the most on
>this issue, and on the archeological F as a whole) say the enonce = "a
>serious speech act," a la Austin, but I'm not satisfied with this myself.
>
Beth Britt
=====================================================
Elizabeth C. Britt
Asst. Professor
Master of Technical and Professional Writing Program
Department of English
406 HO
Northeastern University
Boston, MA 02115
(617) 373-5170
ecbritt@xxxxxxxx
of my dissertation research (a piece of legislation). I found
Carole Blair's work particularly helpful:
Blair, Carole. ÒThe Statement: Foundation of FoucaultÕs Historical
Criticism.Ó Western Journal of Speech Communication 51 (1987): 364-83.
On 22 Sept, Daniel Vukovich wrote:
>My own query: can anyone point me to any essays, chapters, long
>passages on
>F's use of the statement/enonce? What he means by this, its originality
>and useage in F, anyone who has picked up and used this particular bit of
>F.? Dreyfus and Rabinow (who, as far as I know, have written the most on
>this issue, and on the archeological F as a whole) say the enonce = "a
>serious speech act," a la Austin, but I'm not satisfied with this myself.
>
Beth Britt
=====================================================
Elizabeth C. Britt
Asst. Professor
Master of Technical and Professional Writing Program
Department of English
406 HO
Northeastern University
Boston, MA 02115
(617) 373-5170
ecbritt@xxxxxxxx