At 12:06 13/10/97 -0500, Daniel wrote:
>Towards the beginning
>of that book [presumably 'THe Archaeology'], F does acknowledge a
distinction b/w discursive and
>non-discursive dimensions of social reality, but then clearly focusses only
>on the latter.
Daniel,
Could please clarify (or qualify) this comment? I am thinking of the very
different ready by Barry Smart, who notes the same section ealy in The
Archaeology (pp45-46 in my translation) and then suggests that 'the
question of the relationship between discursive and non-discursive
practices receives little consideration as priority is accorded to the
question of the analysis of discourse' ('Michel FOucault', 1985: 41).
-------------------
Campbell Jones
University of Otago
New Zealand
-------------------
>Towards the beginning
>of that book [presumably 'THe Archaeology'], F does acknowledge a
distinction b/w discursive and
>non-discursive dimensions of social reality, but then clearly focusses only
>on the latter.
Daniel,
Could please clarify (or qualify) this comment? I am thinking of the very
different ready by Barry Smart, who notes the same section ealy in The
Archaeology (pp45-46 in my translation) and then suggests that 'the
question of the relationship between discursive and non-discursive
practices receives little consideration as priority is accorded to the
question of the analysis of discourse' ('Michel FOucault', 1985: 41).
-------------------
Campbell Jones
University of Otago
New Zealand
-------------------