hey malgosia - thanks for the research and url info :)
cheers
sue
-----Original Message-----
From: malgosia askanas <ma@xxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: spam back!!
>A great majority of spam is sent from fake addresses, so returning it
usually
>has no effect other than getting back an "invalid address" error message.
>The non-Virginia headers for this particular spam were as follows:
>
>Received: from www.telecommex.com ([207.48.68.252]) by
lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA04857 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 23:36:52 -0400
>From: maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Received: from tara by www.telecommex.com via SMTP
(951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/940406.SGI)
> id CAA03129; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:27:39 -0500
>Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:27:39 -0500
>Message-Id: <199807030727.CAA03129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: gloria234@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Are you an Internet Marketer?
>
>I checked out userid "maurice" on "netsrv.tobunken.go.jp" and got the reply
>"user unknown", so I suspect that returning the spam is pointless. The
>"www.telecommex.com" information may be relevant to tracing down where the
>spam really came from.
>
>There is a very comprehensive Web page dedicated to spam-fighting tools and
>techniques at:
>
>http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aiken/antispam.html
>
>
>-m
>
cheers
sue
-----Original Message-----
From: malgosia askanas <ma@xxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 5:25 AM
Subject: Re: spam back!!
>A great majority of spam is sent from fake addresses, so returning it
usually
>has no effect other than getting back an "invalid address" error message.
>The non-Virginia headers for this particular spam were as follows:
>
>Received: from www.telecommex.com ([207.48.68.252]) by
lists.village.Virginia.EDU (8.8.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id XAA04857 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 23:36:52 -0400
>From: maurice@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Received: from tara by www.telecommex.com via SMTP
(951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/940406.SGI)
> id CAA03129; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:27:39 -0500
>Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:27:39 -0500
>Message-Id: <199807030727.CAA03129@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: gloria234@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Are you an Internet Marketer?
>
>I checked out userid "maurice" on "netsrv.tobunken.go.jp" and got the reply
>"user unknown", so I suspect that returning the spam is pointless. The
>"www.telecommex.com" information may be relevant to tracing down where the
>spam really came from.
>
>There is a very comprehensive Web page dedicated to spam-fighting tools and
>techniques at:
>
>http://www4.ncsu.edu/~aiken/antispam.html
>
>
>-m
>