>I would suspect that comments on social practices are throughout
>Archaeology, Order of Things, the History of Sexuality, etc.
Comments, yes. But not (as far as I can tell) a sustained
discussion of what makes something count as a _practice_, But I'll look
again, thanks.
>one approach would be to see what Heideggerian influence
>there is on F's understanding of social practices. Since
>Dreyfus is a primary commentator on both Foucault and Heidegger,
>he may have distinguished them and drawn conclusions of influence.
Well that's an interesting idea. Thanks.
-Brandon Claycomb
>kindest regards,
>henry sholar
>Archaeology, Order of Things, the History of Sexuality, etc.
Comments, yes. But not (as far as I can tell) a sustained
discussion of what makes something count as a _practice_, But I'll look
again, thanks.
>one approach would be to see what Heideggerian influence
>there is on F's understanding of social practices. Since
>Dreyfus is a primary commentator on both Foucault and Heidegger,
>he may have distinguished them and drawn conclusions of influence.
Well that's an interesting idea. Thanks.
-Brandon Claycomb
>kindest regards,
>henry sholar