>
>From
Dag Helge Moldenhagen.
I am going to do a project on analyzing different body images by scandinavian
authors. I am looking for methodology to analyze such images.
I thought that I could use hermeneutical phenomenology, bu I also is aware of
the Foucauldian apporach concernings "authorship" or "archaeology."
Anyone who has suggestions on how I could combine those two different
approaches or
use foucauldian methodology in analyzing authors?
> it's the schematics of subject-object relations that interest me here, and
> I think you're spot on to intuit [at least how that's how i sense it most
> of the time] a connection between F. and ANT [this connection also
> implicates Heidegger, and Deleuze-Guattari]. the keele uni web page has an
> excellent ANT bib, and a number of essays: Robert Cooper's 'Assemblage
> notes', http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/staff/rc/pubs-RC1.htm#L1 [links to
> the rest], touches on deleuze-ANT
>
>From
Dag Helge Moldenhagen.
I am going to do a project on analyzing different body images by scandinavian
authors. I am looking for methodology to analyze such images.
I thought that I could use hermeneutical phenomenology, bu I also is aware of
the Foucauldian apporach concernings "authorship" or "archaeology."
Anyone who has suggestions on how I could combine those two different
approaches or
use foucauldian methodology in analyzing authors?
> it's the schematics of subject-object relations that interest me here, and
> I think you're spot on to intuit [at least how that's how i sense it most
> of the time] a connection between F. and ANT [this connection also
> implicates Heidegger, and Deleuze-Guattari]. the keele uni web page has an
> excellent ANT bib, and a number of essays: Robert Cooper's 'Assemblage
> notes', http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/stt/staff/rc/pubs-RC1.htm#L1 [links to
> the rest], touches on deleuze-ANT
>