On Foucault and Heidegger, a principle source is indeed Dreyfus & Rabinow
(though most of the references to Heidegger were removed just before
publication, hence Foucault's rather puzzling endorsement). Dreyfus' article
on Being & Power is in Timothy Armstrong (ed.) Michel Foucault Philosopher.
See also Rabinow in the Cambridge Companion (ed Gutting) and his
introduction to Essential Works I (which show why Dreyfus & Rabinow now
disagree). Also useful is Allan Megill, Prophets of Extremity; Charles
Scott, A Question of
Ethics, and an article in the new issue of Radical Philosophy No 91 by
Michael Schwartz.
But really, that isn't very much and a lot of it is not terribly useful.
This is despite Foucault's comment on Heidegger as the 'essential
philosopher'. As some of you know, this link is a principle theme of my
soon to be submitted thesis.
Best wishes
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell Jones <campbell.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 22:39
Subject: Re: Books and papers on Foucault and Heidegger
>
>Hubert Dreyfus might beworth looking at for comment on the relationship
>between Fucault and Heidegger. Although members of this list will probably
>know his book on Foucault ('beyond structuralism and hermeneutics', with
>Paul Rabinow, Chicago uni press), he has also written lots on Heidegger (eg
>'being-in-the-world, 1991). I also heard him give a paper called 'Being in
>Heidegger and Power in Foucault', or something like that. This may have
>been published.
>
>Good luck,
>
>
>
>
>
>Campbell Jones
>Department of Management
>University of Otago
>Po Box 56
>Dunedin
>Aotearoa New Zealand
>Ph. 64-3-479-7387
>Fax.64-3-479-8173
>
>
(though most of the references to Heidegger were removed just before
publication, hence Foucault's rather puzzling endorsement). Dreyfus' article
on Being & Power is in Timothy Armstrong (ed.) Michel Foucault Philosopher.
See also Rabinow in the Cambridge Companion (ed Gutting) and his
introduction to Essential Works I (which show why Dreyfus & Rabinow now
disagree). Also useful is Allan Megill, Prophets of Extremity; Charles
Scott, A Question of
Ethics, and an article in the new issue of Radical Philosophy No 91 by
Michael Schwartz.
But really, that isn't very much and a lot of it is not terribly useful.
This is despite Foucault's comment on Heidegger as the 'essential
philosopher'. As some of you know, this link is a principle theme of my
soon to be submitted thesis.
Best wishes
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Campbell Jones <campbell.jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, October 15, 1998 22:39
Subject: Re: Books and papers on Foucault and Heidegger
>
>Hubert Dreyfus might beworth looking at for comment on the relationship
>between Fucault and Heidegger. Although members of this list will probably
>know his book on Foucault ('beyond structuralism and hermeneutics', with
>Paul Rabinow, Chicago uni press), he has also written lots on Heidegger (eg
>'being-in-the-world, 1991). I also heard him give a paper called 'Being in
>Heidegger and Power in Foucault', or something like that. This may have
>been published.
>
>Good luck,
>
>
>
>
>
>Campbell Jones
>Department of Management
>University of Otago
>Po Box 56
>Dunedin
>Aotearoa New Zealand
>Ph. 64-3-479-7387
>Fax.64-3-479-8173
>
>