Vunch:
You wrote:
- In
>the 60's, the students radicals were astonished and outraged that Marcuse
and
>Adorno did not participate in the planned uprising of '68.
Ana says:
You are wright in what concerns to Adorno. But it is wrong in the case of
Marcuse, that participated a lot in the uprising of ´68.
You said:
>
>I think you are harboring some misconceptions about the FS works. Yes,
there
>were some members who were communists in the early 20's when it was quite
>progressive and popular, but the FS has always pointed out that Marx's
>fundamental thesis has never consisted of even a single shred of evidence,
>namely, the eventual collapse of capitalism.
Ana says:
Adorno considered himbself a marxist thinker, althoug he critizised many
ideas of Marx, for example the one you point refering to collapse of
capitalism. Nevertheless, I think that it is important to consider that
Adorno writes in times in which many things have happened, his perspective
is quite different having lived many years after Adorno.
Ana
You wrote:
- In
>the 60's, the students radicals were astonished and outraged that Marcuse
and
>Adorno did not participate in the planned uprising of '68.
Ana says:
You are wright in what concerns to Adorno. But it is wrong in the case of
Marcuse, that participated a lot in the uprising of ´68.
You said:
>
>I think you are harboring some misconceptions about the FS works. Yes,
there
>were some members who were communists in the early 20's when it was quite
>progressive and popular, but the FS has always pointed out that Marx's
>fundamental thesis has never consisted of even a single shred of evidence,
>namely, the eventual collapse of capitalism.
Ana says:
Adorno considered himbself a marxist thinker, althoug he critizised many
ideas of Marx, for example the one you point refering to collapse of
capitalism. Nevertheless, I think that it is important to consider that
Adorno writes in times in which many things have happened, his perspective
is quite different having lived many years after Adorno.
Ana