Stuart:
Touche. Have you at hand the sign-up address for the Heidegger list?
Thanks,
Matthew
>From owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 19 03:02:00 1999
>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id FAA03162 for foucault-outgoing; Fri, 19 Feb 1999
05:26:45 -0500
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender
to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>Received: from remus.clara.net (remus.clara.net [195.8.69.79]) by
lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA57670 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 05:26:23 -0500
>Received: from gtpgsre (du-029-0132.claranet.co.uk [195.8.87.132])
> by remus.clara.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA24763
> for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:21:19
GMT
> (envelope-from Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx)
>Message-ID: <000301be5bf1$90690440$845708c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>From: "Stuart Elden" <Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Bad Writing?
>Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:15:53 -0000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3007.0
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3007.0
>Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>I wrote
>
>> Heidegger, for example, shouldn't be readily
>>>comprehensible. He assumed a great deal of background knowledge in
his
>>work:
>>>who can blame him. And when he is bastardised to suit the purposes of
a
>>>wider audience I can't help but feel that something serious is
missing.
>>
>
>
>Matthew wrote
>
>>You're quite right, although wouldn't you say that he made quite a
nasty
>>habit of "bastardizing" himself--in rectoral addresses, student
>>newspapers, and the like?
>>
>>Just asking.
>
>>
>
>
>Habit is too strong a word. He did this for a couple of years (33-34)
and
>the problems are well documented. But other public lectures etc. were
not a
>bastardisation of his thought, indeed some of his most important late
works
>come from them. The wider issue of Heidegger's politics is not really
the
>concern of this list. But there is a good ongoing discussion of it on
the
>parallel Heidegger mailing group.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Stuart
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Touche. Have you at hand the sign-up address for the Heidegger list?
Thanks,
Matthew
>From owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 19 03:02:00 1999
>Received: (from domo@localhost) by lists.village.virginia.edu
(8.8.5/8.6.6) id FAA03162 for foucault-outgoing; Fri, 19 Feb 1999
05:26:45 -0500
>X-Authentication-Warning: lists.village.virginia.edu: domo set sender
to owner-foucault@localhost using -f
>Received: from remus.clara.net (remus.clara.net [195.8.69.79]) by
lists.village.virginia.edu (8.8.5/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA57670 for
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 05:26:23 -0500
>Received: from gtpgsre (du-029-0132.claranet.co.uk [195.8.87.132])
> by remus.clara.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA24763
> for <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 10:21:19
GMT
> (envelope-from Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx)
>Message-ID: <000301be5bf1$90690440$845708c3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>From: "Stuart Elden" <Stuart.Elden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: Bad Writing?
>Date: Fri, 19 Feb 1999 09:15:53 -0000
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>X-Priority: 3
>X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3007.0
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3007.0
>Sender: owner-foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>I wrote
>
>> Heidegger, for example, shouldn't be readily
>>>comprehensible. He assumed a great deal of background knowledge in
his
>>work:
>>>who can blame him. And when he is bastardised to suit the purposes of
a
>>>wider audience I can't help but feel that something serious is
missing.
>>
>
>
>Matthew wrote
>
>>You're quite right, although wouldn't you say that he made quite a
nasty
>>habit of "bastardizing" himself--in rectoral addresses, student
>>newspapers, and the like?
>>
>>Just asking.
>
>>
>
>
>Habit is too strong a word. He did this for a couple of years (33-34)
and
>the problems are well documented. But other public lectures etc. were
not a
>bastardisation of his thought, indeed some of his most important late
works
>come from them. The wider issue of Heidegger's politics is not really
the
>concern of this list. But there is a good ongoing discussion of it on
the
>parallel Heidegger mailing group.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Stuart
>
>
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com