Chad:
I'm not sure I'm up to that, but fishing through Archaeology of Knowledge,
especially the conclusion, and especially the essay at the back: the
discourse on language, should help. The conclusion has a brilliant dialogue
with a fictitious interlocutor who trashes Foucault's whole position, but in
the course of this, a definition of discouse emerges.
sb
Examhell@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Could anyone give me a concise definition of the term discourse as used in
> FOucault's work, and the term non-discursive as well?
> Thanks,
> Chad
--
____________________________
Sam Binkley
Department of Sociology, New School University
65 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003
Address: PO Box 20202, New York, NY 10009
phone: (212) 420 9425 web: http://www.erols.com/sbinkley/
I'm not sure I'm up to that, but fishing through Archaeology of Knowledge,
especially the conclusion, and especially the essay at the back: the
discourse on language, should help. The conclusion has a brilliant dialogue
with a fictitious interlocutor who trashes Foucault's whole position, but in
the course of this, a definition of discouse emerges.
sb
Examhell@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Could anyone give me a concise definition of the term discourse as used in
> FOucault's work, and the term non-discursive as well?
> Thanks,
> Chad
--
____________________________
Sam Binkley
Department of Sociology, New School University
65 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10003
Address: PO Box 20202, New York, NY 10009
phone: (212) 420 9425 web: http://www.erols.com/sbinkley/