published in Macquarie University Newspaper, Australia
At 19:30 2/03/99 -0600, you wrote:
>Exactly what issues has this article from a student newspaper (by
>whom? published where?) "raised." I see no issues, merely a tired
>and cliched repetition of the standard canards (mostly feeble
>and unsupported generalizations about a "class" of people identified
>by a pair of labels that mean nothing but "these are people with whom
>I disagree and so they are bad and worthy of punishment"). I suppose
>the repeated metaphor of the foam is supposed to be evidence of
>creativity and wit, but it does nothing but tie together the
>article. If there are issues--specify them?
>Tom Dillingham
>
>
At 19:30 2/03/99 -0600, you wrote:
>Exactly what issues has this article from a student newspaper (by
>whom? published where?) "raised." I see no issues, merely a tired
>and cliched repetition of the standard canards (mostly feeble
>and unsupported generalizations about a "class" of people identified
>by a pair of labels that mean nothing but "these are people with whom
>I disagree and so they are bad and worthy of punishment"). I suppose
>the repeated metaphor of the foam is supposed to be evidence of
>creativity and wit, but it does nothing but tie together the
>article. If there are issues--specify them?
>Tom Dillingham
>
>