Exactly what issues has this article from a student newspaper (by
whom? published where?) "raised." I see no issues, merely a tired
and cliched repetition of the standard canards (mostly feeble
and unsupported generalizations about a "class" of people identified
by a pair of labels that mean nothing but "these are people with whom
I disagree and so they are bad and worthy of punishment"). I suppose
the repeated metaphor of the foam is supposed to be evidence of
creativity and wit, but it does nothing but tie together the
article. If there are issues--specify them?
Tom Dillingham
whom? published where?) "raised." I see no issues, merely a tired
and cliched repetition of the standard canards (mostly feeble
and unsupported generalizations about a "class" of people identified
by a pair of labels that mean nothing but "these are people with whom
I disagree and so they are bad and worthy of punishment"). I suppose
the repeated metaphor of the foam is supposed to be evidence of
creativity and wit, but it does nothing but tie together the
article. If there are issues--specify them?
Tom Dillingham