I wish I understood what any of this is about! Why did someone,
anonymously, reply to my two word comment, calling me stupid and accusing
me of "atrocious language and faulty information". Who are these
"spammers"? Why does some fool think that we all think he's Ginsberg's
illegitimate son? What has Ginsberg - or Jerry Rubin - got to do with
Foucault? I really don't understand.
Is this all some clever postmodern tactic for disrupting the smooth flow of
discourse, or are there just some crazy folk on the list?
Colin Holmes
>Dear Spammers,
>
>This is not a list in which to play Jerry Rubin trivia games using
>atrocious language and faulty information. If you want to be a
>revolutionary, play your childish games in the Rush Limbaugh listserv,
>where you might actually make some fathead think. At any rate, it is
>clear that the rights to your stupidity were sold to the Coca-Cola
>company.
>
>Alles klar?
>
>
>
>
>>From: c.holmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (colin holmes)
>>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: allan ginsbergs illegitimate son
>>Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:17:25 +1000 (EST)
>>
>>
>>Wow! OK!
>>
>>
>>Colin Holmes,
>>Western Sydney
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Listen I want to clarify something once and for all.
>SO
>>>people stop sending me private mails asking me , pestering me raggin
>me,,
>>>and bein persistent about a silly RUmour. I AM NOT ALLAN GINSBERG'S
>>>ILLEGITMATE SON. GOT THAT??? oKAY?? GOOD NOW REMEMBER IT FOR KEEPS.
>>>
>>> This is a silly story based on a literal reading of the
>Fictions
>>>of Deleuze and Guattari whereinthe narrator, at least one of them, had
>>>said that heshe was the bastard son of Jean Genet. Whichis not the
>same
>>>thing at all. At all.
>>>
>>>
>>> ! So stop buggin me about this.
>>
>>
>
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com