A look at What is enlightenment (Qu'est-ce que les Lumieres) will be helpful.
This article has 2 versions and I would recommend BOTH, since the first is not usually talked about.
You will be surprised!
Atefeh
????????????????????
At 10:31 PM 4/29/1999 +0200, you wrote:
>You are pulling our leg :-)
>Christoph
>
>Matthew King schrieb:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Eun-joo Cho wrote:
>> > What's the main difference between Foucault and Adorno's view on
>> > Enlightenment?
>>
>> Foucault thought it was a good idea.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> ---Matthew A. King---Department of Philosophy---York University, Toronto---
>> dear readers, my apologies.
>> I'm drifting in and out of sleep.
>> ---------------------------------(R.E.M.)----------------------------------
>
<bold><italic>The foucaldien ethos has already reached his/her eternal
utopia in the "present". No need for further move!
</italic></bold>
This article has 2 versions and I would recommend BOTH, since the first is not usually talked about.
You will be surprised!
Atefeh
????????????????????
At 10:31 PM 4/29/1999 +0200, you wrote:
>You are pulling our leg :-)
>Christoph
>
>Matthew King schrieb:
>
>> On Thu, 29 Apr 1999, Eun-joo Cho wrote:
>> > What's the main difference between Foucault and Adorno's view on
>> > Enlightenment?
>>
>> Foucault thought it was a good idea.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> ---Matthew A. King---Department of Philosophy---York University, Toronto---
>> dear readers, my apologies.
>> I'm drifting in and out of sleep.
>> ---------------------------------(R.E.M.)----------------------------------
>
<bold><italic>The foucaldien ethos has already reached his/her eternal
utopia in the "present". No need for further move!
</italic></bold>