I tend to agree with Erik on this one. There is a great danger in using the
English translations of Heidegger and Foucault in order to see the links
between them. Foucault read Heidegger in German and is profoundly influenced
by his thought (both for and against) but i'm not at all sure this link is a
profitable one to pursue. Serious thought needs to be given to what
Heidegger meant by Lichtung, how it linked to the Augenblick, the blink of
an eye/moment... etc. And then maybe think about Foucault and what he means.
If it isn't linguistically impossible try reading Heidegger in German and
French translations - I did this for my PhD (on Heidegger and Foucault - to
be published by Athlone in 2001) and understood Foucault a lot better for
it.
Best
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 20:39
Subject: Re: "Lightning of possible storms"
Hallo aarouxet
Op dinsdag, 24-aug-99 schreef aarouxet:
a| Mathew. why don't you connect this idea of lightning with Heidegger's
a| Lichtung. It's not my own idea. Remember Deleuze. Andrea Arouxet.
Don't, Matthew! Lichtung means a clearing in the wood here, where the trees
let
through a bit of sunshine. My interpretation off hand would be that in the
forest
of language there can be places with a hinch of truth (aletheia).
Old Marty was a mystic allright, but a very gentle and bureaucratic one.
regards
--
erik
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~*
Erik Hoogcarspel < jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx >< Boerhaaveln
99b >
< tl+31.(0)104157097 >< 3112 LE
Schiedam >
< fx+31.(0)842113137 >< Holland
>
*===========================================================================
========*
English translations of Heidegger and Foucault in order to see the links
between them. Foucault read Heidegger in German and is profoundly influenced
by his thought (both for and against) but i'm not at all sure this link is a
profitable one to pursue. Serious thought needs to be given to what
Heidegger meant by Lichtung, how it linked to the Augenblick, the blink of
an eye/moment... etc. And then maybe think about Foucault and what he means.
If it isn't linguistically impossible try reading Heidegger in German and
French translations - I did this for my PhD (on Heidegger and Foucault - to
be published by Athlone in 2001) and understood Foucault a lot better for
it.
Best
Stuart
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hoogcarspel <jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 20:39
Subject: Re: "Lightning of possible storms"
Hallo aarouxet
Op dinsdag, 24-aug-99 schreef aarouxet:
a| Mathew. why don't you connect this idea of lightning with Heidegger's
a| Lichtung. It's not my own idea. Remember Deleuze. Andrea Arouxet.
Don't, Matthew! Lichtung means a clearing in the wood here, where the trees
let
through a bit of sunshine. My interpretation off hand would be that in the
forest
of language there can be places with a hinch of truth (aletheia).
Old Marty was a mystic allright, but a very gentle and bureaucratic one.
regards
--
erik
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~*
Erik Hoogcarspel < jehms@xxxxxxxxxxxx >< Boerhaaveln
99b >
< tl+31.(0)104157097 >< 3112 LE
Schiedam >
< fx+31.(0)842113137 >< Holland
>
*===========================================================================
========*