Hey Jeffrey, Have you read Kosselleck's book, "Futures Past"? it attempts
what I think u have in mind. I think it's subtitle is "The history f
historical experience."
>From: Jeffrey Hearn <jeffreyhearn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: re: History of...
>Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 07:32:54 -0500
>
>We basically need to rewrite the history of _everything_ from within a
>Foucauldian/genealogical/nomadic point of view, but the one I most wish to
>see, and will write one day if nobody else will, is a genealogy of modern
>historiographic practice itself.
>
>Jeffrey Hearn
>The Untimely Past
>
>
>----------------------- Internet Header --------------------------------
>Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2000 21:48:56 -0800 (PST)
>From: Travis Ennis <tlennis_iu@xxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: History of...
>To: foucault@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Foucault wrote the history of madness, the medical gaze, the prison system,
>sexuality. I have read that his next work, if he had lived, was going to
>be a history of war, the institutions of war and the military dimension of
>society. I thought that other topics that would be prime for Foucauldian
>study would be the history of death, dreams, eroticism, and marriage. I
>would like to know what everyones thoughts are concerning what histories
>of... would yield the most interesting results if looked at from a
>Foucauldian perspective.
>
>Thanks
>
>Travis Ennis
[The sport of understanding is a game without rules, forever demanding that
we make them up as we go...
Chris Daly]
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com