On 09/23/00 13:27:28 you wrote:
>Frankly, it is not clear to me how one can argue the silencing of one group
>in favor of another after reading Foucault--or perhaps I am misreading your
>post?
I have a question (probably rather stupid for this group) regarding this question,
which I have heard posed and argued about and that tends create in my experience
divisions that lay in postions of certian discourses.Isn't this question rooted in
notions of freedom of speech (freedom, rights and feelings) and poistions in
relationship to power? What questions can folks ask about this question as it
relates to Focualt is what I'd be interested in.
Laura
>
>I have not read her book.
>
>Todd Comer
>
>> Misrepresentation is misrepresentation, and it certainly doesn't justify
>> further misrepresentation. I know, I know, it's going to happen, the law of
>> action and reaction, etc., but I can't imagine why one would waste one's
>> time. Anyone read Buchannan's book lately?
>>
>> joe brennan
>
>
>Frankly, it is not clear to me how one can argue the silencing of one group
>in favor of another after reading Foucault--or perhaps I am misreading your
>post?
I have a question (probably rather stupid for this group) regarding this question,
which I have heard posed and argued about and that tends create in my experience
divisions that lay in postions of certian discourses.Isn't this question rooted in
notions of freedom of speech (freedom, rights and feelings) and poistions in
relationship to power? What questions can folks ask about this question as it
relates to Focualt is what I'd be interested in.
Laura
>
>I have not read her book.
>
>Todd Comer
>
>> Misrepresentation is misrepresentation, and it certainly doesn't justify
>> further misrepresentation. I know, I know, it's going to happen, the law of
>> action and reaction, etc., but I can't imagine why one would waste one's
>> time. Anyone read Buchannan's book lately?
>>
>> joe brennan
>
>